Psychology of Actions: Recognizing which System is dominant

A Framework for recognizing which cognitive system, between System 1 and System 2, is dominating our decision-making process

Aug 29, 2024

In the previous two articles, I introduced you to System 1 and System 2 Thinking, and the Process of Change for Personal Development. I’ve listed those articles here. I highly encourage you to read them to develop an even deeper understanding of this article.

I’m also linking other related articles here for you to check out.

Introduction

The words were on the tip of your tongue. And the urge to erupt like a violent volcano was intense. Once filled with laughter, the family dinner party conversation had turned into a tense battlefield. Your mind was racing. And you were experiencing a whirlwind of emotions and thoughts swirling together.

Your pulse had quickened, and a part of you—an instinctual, almost primal—urged you to say the first thing that came to your mind, lash out, and defend your pride. It took every ounce of your mental energy to restrain yourself from blurting out the things coming to your head. But, with that moment of hesitation, that brief pause, another voice that was responsible for restraining you emerged. It was quieter but steadier and asked you to think twice. "Is this worth it?"

In that moment, you were caught in the push and pull between two forces within your mind. On one side, your System 1 (fast, automatic, effortless) was ready to take charge, relying on gut reactions, emotional impulses, and the need for immediate resolution. On the other side, System 2 (slow, deliberate, effortful) stepped in, urging you to weigh your words carefully, to consider the consequences, and to reflect before you act.

This internal conflict is a universal experience. And it's the essence of decision-making on a spectrum. The struggle between these two systems happens every day, in moments big and small. It shapes the outcomes of our actions and the directions of our lives. But how often do we stop to recognize which system is in control? How usually do we catch ourselves before a snap judgment or hold back an impulsive reaction?

Understanding this balance—knowing when System 1 is taking over and when System 2 needs to step in—can be the difference between a decision that leads to regret and one that brings us closer to our goals.

Decision-Making On A Spectrum

Whether choosing a career path, deciding how to respond during a heated argument, or even something as simple as picking what to eat for dinner, the decision-making is not binary. It doesn't just happen in a vacuum of right or wrong, yes or no. Instead, decision-making exists on a broad spectrum, where each choice lies somewhere between impulsive action and careful deliberation.

we think that we make our decisions because we have good reasons to make them.

~ Daniel Kahneman

On one end of this spectrum, we have decisions driven by our System 1—fast, automatic, and frankly, quite often emotionally charged. These are the choices we make in the blink of an eye, guided by intuition, habit, or gut feeling. They require little conscious thought, allowing us to react quickly to situations where speed is crucial. However, this speed can come at the cost of accuracy or foresight, leading us down paths we might not have chosen with a saner head.

On the other end lies System 2 decision-making—slower, more deliberate, and rooted in reason. These decisions demand our full attention, engaging our analytical abilities and requiring us to weigh options, predict outcomes, and consider long-term consequences. Although this process can be mentally taxing, it often leads to more thoughtful and informed choices.

But most of our decision-making doesn't neatly fall into one category or the other. It exists somewhere along the spectrum, blending elements of both systems. Sometimes, a decision may start with a gut feeling, but we then pause to reflect and analyze before acting. Other times, we might begin with careful consideration, only to find ourselves swayed by an emotional impulse at the last minute.

Decisions can fall anywhere along this spectrum:

Pure System 1: Decisions made entirely on intuition and emotion, without conscious deliberation.
System 1 Dominated: Decisions heavily influenced by System 1 Thinking, with limited involvement of System 2 Thinking.
Balanced Decision Making: A combination of System 1 and System 2 Thinking, where rational analysis tempers intuition.
System 2 Dominated: Decisions primarily driven by deliberate thought and analysis, with minimal reliance on intuition.
Pure System 2: Decisions made entirely through conscious, logical reasoning, without any influence from System 1 Thinking.

Recognizing where your decision-making process falls on this spectrum is crucial because it informs not just what you decide but how you arrive at that decision. It is the difference between reacting out of habit and responding with intention.

The Two Aspects of Personal Development

What exactly is Personal Growth at its core? It's responding intentionally via System 2 Thinking to situations your previous version would have reacted to out of habit via System 1 Thinking. And keep repeating this process until your intentional responses replace the old habitual reactions and become the new ones.

Now, this Process of Change for Personal Development hinges on two aspects:

Recognition of Automatic System 1 Responses
The first aspect of personal development involves the recognition of automatic responses that arise from System 1. The automatic responses are the quick, reflexive actions and thoughts that occur without conscious deliberation. While System 1 is essential for everyday functioning—requiring low cognitive load to navigate familiar environments and respond to immediate threats—it can also lead us astray in crucial situations. Automatic responses are affected by biases, ingrained habits, or emotional reactions that may not serve our best interests in the long term.
Recognition here means becoming aware of these patterns across various contexts in your life. It's about identifying the moments when your autopilot (System 1 Thinking) is steering the ship and understanding that these knee-jerk reactions might not always align with your values or goals. Recognizing these automatic responses is the first step in personal development. It creates the awareness crucial to pause and consider whether a more deliberate approach might be beneficial.
Awareness to Engage System 2 Thinking
The second aspect of personal development is developing situational awareness. It involves recognizing when and where to override System 1 with the more deliberate and analytical System 2. Not every situation requires deep analysis or prolonged consideration. But, some scenarios demand a conscious shift from instinctual reaction to thoughtful response.
Awareness here means being attuned to the triggers or contexts that call for System 2's involvement. These could be situations where the stakes are high, the consequences are long-lasting, or situations where past experiences have shown that quick judgments often lead to unfavorable outcomes. By recognizing these critical moments, you can intentionally engage System 2, allowing yourself to think more deeply, challenge assumptions, and make decisions aligned with your long-term objectives.
This awareness is crucial because it provides the mental space to implement what I call the "Dominant Thought System Recognition Framework." This framework helps you assess which cognitive mode—System 1 or System 2—is dominating your decision-making in a situation. By doing so, you can make informed choices about when to switch from automatic to deliberate thinking, ensuring that your actions are not only appropriate for the situation but also conducive to personal growth.

So, now let’s dive into the "Dominant Thought System Recognition Framework."

Dominant Thought System Recognition Framework

Here are the components of the framework to recognize which System of Thinking (System 1 or System 2) is dominating/dominated your decision-making:

1. Situation Analysis

Trigger Identification: Start by identifying the trigger or stimulus that initiates the thought process. Ask, "What sparked this reaction or decision?"
Contextual Awareness: Consider the environment and context. Is it familiar or novel? Routine or unexpected? This helps determine if System 1's automatic response or System 2's deliberative thinking is likely to be engaged.

2. Reaction Assessment

Speed of Response: Evaluate how quickly you reacted. A fast, instinctual response often indicates System 1, while a slower, more considered reaction suggests System 2.
Emotional Intensity: Gauge the emotional charge of your response. System 1 is usually more emotionally driven, while System 2 operates with less emotional influence.
Mental Effort: Reflect on the level of mental effort involved. Was the decision or action effortless, or did it require conscious effort and reasoning?

3. Cognitive Processing

Type of Thought Process: Determine if your thought process was associative and pattern-based (System 1) or logical and step-by-step (System 2).
Use of Heuristics: Recognize if you relied on mental shortcuts (heuristics) or biases, which are hallmarks of System 1. System 2 is more analytical and less prone to such biases.
Awareness of Alternatives: Consider if you evaluated multiple options or if the decision felt like the only viable choice. System 2 tends to weigh alternatives more thoroughly.

4. Outcome Reflection

Satisfaction with Outcome: Assess your satisfaction with the outcome. System 1 decisions may lead to regret if they were made too hastily, whereas System 2 decisions, though slower, tend to result in more satisfactory outcomes.
Need for Justification: Reflect on whether you feel the need to justify your decision to yourself or others. System 2 decisions often come with a need for justification due to the effort involved.

5. Behavioral Patterns

Habitual Actions: Identify if the behavior is habitual or learned through repetition. Habitual actions are typically governed by System 1.
Reflection and Revision: Consider if you frequently reflect on and revise this type of decision. Continuous reflection and revision are signs of System 2 engagement.

6. Feedback Loop

Continuous Improvement: Incorporate feedback from past decisions into future decision-making processes. Recognize when System 1 served you well or when System 2 was necessary.
Mindfulness Practices: Engage in mindfulness to increase awareness of your cognitive modes, enhancing your ability to recognize and regulate them in real-time.

For Practical Application

Decision-making Scenarios: Apply this framework to various scenarios, such as everyday decisions, professional choices, interpersonal interactions, or any other situation that you feel needs you to improve your response. It will aid you in identifying patterns in your cognitive mode.
Practice Switching Systems: Develop the ability to consciously switch from System 1 to System 2 when necessary, especially in situations that require careful analysis or where the stakes are high.
Share

Concluding Thoughts

Recognizing which cognitive system, between System 1 and System 2, dominates our decision-making is more than just a thought exercise. It is a practical skill that can transform how we navigate challenges. By understanding that our decisions fall on a spectrum, influenced by either the quick, automatic responses of System 1 or the deliberate, rational thinking of System 2, we gain the awareness to make more informed, intentional choices.

This awareness isn't about suppressing one system in favor of the other. Instead, it's about knowing when to let System 1's intuition guide you and when to engage System 2 for deeper analysis. The real art lies in balancing these systems, leveraging the strengths of each in the right contexts.

The “Dominant Thought System Recognition Framework” I shared in this article is a tool to help you develop that balance. It equips you to detect when you're relying too heavily on automatic responses. In doing so, you can better align your actions with the change you seek, leading to more effective personal growth.

That is all for this week. If you like this article, please share it with the people who matter in your life. And, if you have not subscribed yet, please do and join us on this fascinating journey of intentional change.

Stay genuine! Stay authentic!

Nik Pathran

PS: I appreciate you reading. Thanks to the new subscribers!